• "I don't see any chemistry here!" Fans Divided Over Chemistry between Yang Sejong and Suzy for "Doona"

    The anticipated pairing of Yang Sejong and Suzy in a recent project has stirred up discussions among fans, with opinions divided on whether the on-screen duo shares palpable chemistry.

    Voices in the online community have expressed a range of sentiments, with some fans asserting that the two stars "Honestly DON'T SUIT EACH OTHER."

    One netizen commented, "I don't see any chemistry," sparking a conversation about the perceived dynamics between the actors.

    Among the comments, a prevalent observation emerged about the apparent differences in vibes when Yang Sejong and Suzy are pictured together.

    One fan remarked, "Their vibes are too different when you look at their pictures together," while another noted, "Yang Sejong looks so nervous."

    However, not all fans interpreted the interactions negatively. Some found Yang Sejong's nervousness endearing. "The fact that Yang Sejong is so nervous here is cute... They look fine," remarked a supporter, suggesting that the chemistry might be more subtle and nuanced.

    The discussion extended to speculations about the actors' appearances, with one netizen questioning, "Did he gain baby fat in his cheeks or he's just bloated?"

    This led to further debates about Yang Sejong's facial changes and whether it could be attributed to the styling for the project.

    Comparisons to Suzy's previous on-screen partnerships added another layer to the conversation.

    "Because I think Suzy's best chemistry was with Kim Woo Bin and Kim Soo Hyun, I don't see any chemistry here," expressed a fan, highlighting the subjective nature of on-screen pairings.

    Despite the reservations expressed through comments, some fans took a more optimistic stance. "They look good together on video," observed one netizen, emphasizing that chemistry might manifest more convincingly in motion rather than in static images.

    As the project featuring Yang Sejong and Suzy unfolds, it remains to be seen whether the on-screen chemistry will resonate with a broader audience.

    The diverse reactions from fans only add to the anticipation, turning the discussion into a testament to the subjective nature of on-screen pairings in the world of K-dramas.

    Source(1)

  • Kim Soo Hyun Cannot Be Prosecuted for Alleged Relationship with the Late Kim Sae Ron as a Minor—Lawyer Explains Why the Law Does Not Apply

    Kim Soo Hyun has admitted to dating the late Kim Sae Ron but strongly denies that their relationship began when she was a minor.

    On March 14, Kim Soo Hyun’s agency, Gold Medalist, released a statement saying, “Kim Soo Hyun and Kim Sae Ron dated from the summer of 2019, after she became an adult, until the fall of 2020.” They emphasized, “The claim that he was in a relationship with her when she was a minor is not true.”

    The agency also clarified that the photos of the two, which were revealed by Garo Sero Research Institute (Gaseyeon) and Kim Sae Ron herself, were taken in 2020 when she was already of legal age.

    Regarding the legal implications of the allegations, lawyer Lee Go Eun appeared on YTN News to discuss whether Kim Soo Hyun could face charges if it were proven that he had been in a relationship with Kim Sae Ron when she was underage.

    When asked about the possibility of legal punishment, Lee explained, “Under the law revised in May 2020, any physical relationship with a minor under the age of 16, even with consent, could lead to serious charges.”

    However, she pointed out a key legal detail, saying, “Before the 2020 revision, the law applied only to minors under 13 years old. Since Kim Sae Ron was 15 in 2015, the legal framework at the time does not classify her as a protected minor in this context.”

    Lee concluded, “Given the laws in place at the time, it seems difficult for Kim Soo Hyun to face legal consequences.”

    She further added, “For any case to proceed against him, there would need to be clear evidence of more than just dating. Based on what is currently known, holding him legally accountable may be challenging.”

    Source: [1]